Monday, 23 June 2014

From Mrs. Watanabe To Abenomics: The Yen's Wild Ride

Relatively recent upstarts like the euro and the yuan may hog the currency headlines these days, but for sheer drama and gut-wrenching volatility, no currency can match the venerable Japanese yen. The yen has frequently found itself in the spotlight since it transitioned to a floating currency in the early 1970s. It has had an incredible trading range over the past 40-plus years, ranging from 360 to the dollar in 1971 to 75.35 in late 2011. Along the way, the yen has spawned a whole series of fascinating sub-plots with colorful terminology - a massive asset bubblethe “lost decade,” carry trades, “Mrs. Watanabes,” “Abenomics” and “three arrows.”

The Early Years

Under the Bretton Woods system, the yen was pegged at a level of 360 to the dollar from 1949 until 1971, when the United States abandoned the gold standard in response to a huge outflow of bullion holdings spurred by the nation's mounting trade deficits. To redress its trade deficits, the U.S. also devalued the dollar against the yen in 1971, fixing it at a level of 308 per dollar.

By 1973, most major world currencies, including the yen, were floating. The Japanese economy managed to withstand the challenging environment of the 1970s, characterized by soaring oil prices and rampant inflation. By the mid-1980s, the Japanese export juggernaut was again accumulating substantial current account surpluses. In 1985, with the U.S. current account deficit approaching 3% of GDP, the G5 countries (the U.S., France, West Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom) agreed to depreciate the dollar’s value against the yen and deutsche mark, in order to rectify burgeoning trade imbalances.

This agreement, which has gone down in posterity as the Plaza Accord, caused the yen to appreciate from about 250 to the dollar at the beginning of 1985, to below 160 in less than two years. Some experts believe that this surge in the value of the yen was the root cause of the subsequent asset bubble and bust, which in turn led to Japan’s lost decade.

Japan’s Asset Bubble and Lost Decade(s)

The 50% appreciation in the yen took its toll on the Japanese economy, which fell intorecession in 1986. In order to counter the yen’s strength and reinvigorate the economy, Japanese authorities introduced sizeable stimulus measures, which included reducing the benchmark interest rate by about 3 percentage points. This accommodative monetary policy stance was left in place until 1989. In 1987, a sizeable fiscal package was also introduced, even though the economy had already begun taking off.

These stimulus measures caused an asset bubble of truly breathtaking proportions, with stocks and urban land prices tripling from 1985 to 1989. An oft-cited anecdote about the extent of the real estate bubble is that at its 1990 peak, the value of just the Imperial Palace grounds in Tokyo exceeded that of all the real estate in California.

These valuations were simply unsustainable, and predictably, the bubble burst in early 1990. Japan’s Nikkei index lost a third of its value within a year, setting the stage for the lost decade of the 1990s, when the economy barely grew as deflation took an iron grip. While Japan was one of the fastest-growing economies in the three decades from the 1960s to the 1980s, real GDP growth has averaged only 1.1% since 1990.

The first decade of this millennium was another lost decade, as the economy continued to struggle and the global credit crisis made matters worse. At its October 2008 low of just below 7,000, the Nikkei index had plunged more than 80% from its December 1989 peak. In 2010, Japan was overtaken by China as the world’s second-largest economy.

The Trillion-Dollar Yen Carry Trade

In order to get the economy going and combat deflation, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) adopted a zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) for much of the period since 1990. This made the yen an ideal funding currency for the carry trade, which essentially involves borrowing a low-interest currency and converting the borrowed amount into a higher-yielding currency. As long as the exchange rate remains quite stable, the trader can pocket the interest differential between the two currencies. Since foreign exchange fluctuation is the main risk of carry trades, their popularity is inversely proportional to exchange rate volatility.

By 2007, with volatility on one-month yen options at a 15-year low, and with the Japanese currency depreciating steadily against the dollar, carry trades with the yen as a funding currency had reached an estimated $1 trillion. But that hitherto profitable trading strategy began to unravel as the credit crisis began hitting global financial markets in the second half of 2007. As risk appetite vanished literally overnight, panicked speculators and traders were forced to sell their highly leveraged assets at fire-sale prices, and then endure the mortification of repaying their yen borrowings with a sharply appreciating currency.

The yen surged by 20% against the dollar in 2008, the year the credit crisis peaked. A popular carry trade before the crisis erupted involved borrowing yen to invest in Australian dollar deposits, which were yielding a significantly higher rate of interest; this was equivalent to a short JPY/long AUD position. As the crisis worsened and credit dried up, the stampede to close out this position resulted in the Australian dollar plummeting by 47% against the yen in the one-year period commencing October 2007. A speculator who had borrowed 100 million yen, converted it to AUD in October 2007 (at an exchange rate of about 107.50) and placed the resultant AUD in a higher-yielding deposit, would have suffered a loss of 47 million yen a year later, as the exchange rate plunged to a low of 57.

Domo Arigato, Mrs. Watanabe!

Currency speculators large and small were severely affected by the 2007-2008 credit crisis. Among the smaller players, Japanese retail investors lost an estimated $2.5 billion through currency trading in August 2007 alone, as the crisis was just unfolding. Their eventual losses by the time the crisis peaked may have been many multiples of that number.

An unexpected category of speculator to be lured by the prospect of quick profits through online currency trading was the Japanese housewife, dubbed “Mrs. Watanabe” by forextraders. Given the paltry returns from yen deposits in the first decade of this millennium, legions of Mrs. Watanabes ventured into online currency trading in order to increase the low returns on their portfolios. Their modus operandus was typically to sell the yen and buy higher-yielding currencies, unwittingly getting into the carry trade by doing so.

While estimates vary about the extent of currency trading by these Japanese retail investors, some experts placed it at about $16.3 billion per day in 2011, or almost 60% of daily customer forex transactions (excluding interbank trading) during Tokyo trading hours. Retail trading volumes contracted sharply from 2012, as regulations imposed by Japanese authorities in August 2010 on the maximum permissible forex leverage went into effect. These restrictions limited forex leverage to a maximum of 25 times the invested amount, compared with as much as 200 times before the regulations were imposed.

In any case, the influence of Mrs. Watanabes and other Japanese retail investors on the level of the yen was tacitly acknowledged by the Bank of Japan in 2007, although it stopped short of saying Domo Arigato (translation: thanks a lot!). In July of that year, Bank of Japan member Kiyohiko Nishimura said that the “housewives of Tokyo” were acting to stabilize forex markets, by taking yen positions (i.e. selling yen and buying foreign currencies) opposite to that of professional traders.

Yen Trading Surges 

According to the Bank for International Settlement’s (BIS) triennial survey of forex turnover, conducted in 2013, trading in the Japanese yen increased the most among the major currencies over the preceding three years, surging by 63% since the 2010 survey. While overall currency trading in the global forex market increased by 34.6% since 2010 to $5.345 trillion per day, trading in USD/JPY soared by 72.5% to $978 billion daily.

While a tiny part of that USD/JPY forex turnover may be backed by actual trade flows, the bulk of it seems to be speculative. Japan was the United States’ fourth-largest trading partner in 2013, accounting for just over 5% of total trade for the U.S. The United States had a merchandise trade deficit of $73.4 billion with Japan in 2013, importing goods worth $138.5 billion (cars, machines, industrial equipment, and electronics) and exporting goods worth $65.1 billion to Japan (mainly agricultural products, meat, pharmaceuticals and healthcare equipment).

The 2013 BIS survey noted that regional semiannual surveys suggest most of the increased yen trading occurred between October 2012 and April 2013, during which period there were growing expectations of a regime shift in Japanese monetary policy. Which brings us to “Abenomics” and “three arrows.”

Will Abenomics’ Three Arrows Hit Their Mark? 

Abemonics refers to the unprecedented and ambitious economic policy framework announced by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in December 2012, to revitalize the Japanese economy after two decades of stagnation. Abenomics has three main elements or arrows - monetary easing, flexible fiscal policy and structural reforms - aimed at ending deflation, boosting economic growth and reversing the increasing amount of the nation’s debt.

The first arrow from the Abenomics quiver was launched in April 2013, when the Bank of Japan announced that it would buy Japanese government bonds and double the nation’s monetary base to 270 trillion yen by the end of 2014. The BOJ’s objective in introducing this record level of quantitative easing is to vanquish deflation and achieve inflation of 2% by 2015.

The second arrow of flexible fiscal policy involves debt-financed spending and fiscal consolidation starting in 2014, with the goal of slashing the fiscal deficit in half by fiscal year 2015 (from its 2010 level of 6.6% of GDP) and achieving a surplus by 2020. One of the tools to this end is an increase in Japan’s sales tax to 8% starting April 2014, from 5% previously. The third arrow - widespread structural reform - while potentially imparting the biggest benefit to the Japanese economy over the long term, is also seen as the hardest one to launch.

Abenomics’ measures paid off in spades in 2013, as the Nikkei index soared 57% for its biggest annual gain in 41 years, and the yen depreciated 17.6% versus the dollar. However, economic data in the first two months of 2014 has cast some doubts on the sustainability of the positive effects of Abenomics. The Japanese economy grew only 0.3% in the fourth quarter of 2013, which translates into an annualized growth rate of 1%, well below economists’ expectations of 2.8% growth. Japan also reported a record trade deficit of 2.79 trillion yen in January as a 25% increase in imports to an all-time high outweighed a 9.5% rise in exports.

The Bottom Line

Traders who are bearish on the yen point to Japan's huge debt load and dismal demographics as evidence of the nation's grim prospects over the long term. Japan’s netdebt-to-GDP was 140% in 2013, making it the second-most indebted nation in the world after Greece. But as history has shown on more than one occasion, betting on a one-way decline in the yen can be a recipe for disaster. Retail investors and traders who are tempted by the idea of shorting the yen would do well to leave this trade to large institutions and banks that can afford to take the hit if the yen - currently trading at about 102 to the dollar - does not tumble as expected.

Trading The MACD Divergence

The concept behind the MACD is fairly straightforward. Essentially, it calculates the difference between an instrument's 26-day and 12-day exponential moving averages (EMA). Of the two moving averages that make up the MACD, the 12-day EMA is obviously the faster one, while the 26-day is slower. In the calculation of their values, both moving averages use the closing prices of whatever period is measured. On the MACD chart, a nine-day EMA of the MACD itself is plotted as well, and it acts as a trigger for buy and sell decisions. The MACD generates a bullish signal when it moves above its own nine-day EMA, and it sends a sell sign when it moves below its nine-day EMA.

The MACD histogram is an elegant visual representation of the difference between the MACD and its nine-day EMA. The histogram is positive when the MACD is above its nine-day EMA and negative when the MACD is below its nine-day EMA. If prices are rising, the histogram grows larger as the speed of the price movement accelerates, and contracts as price movement decelerates. The same principle works in reverse as prices are falling. See Figure 1 for a good example of a MACD histogram in action.

Figure 1: MACD histogram. As price action (top part of the screen) accelerates to the downside, the MACD histogram (in the lower part of the screen) makes new lows
Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
The MACD histogram is the main reason why so many traders rely on this indicator to measure momentum, because it responds to the speed of price movement. Indeed, most traders use the MACD indicator more frequently to gauge the strength of the price move than to determine the direction of a trend. (To learn more, see Momentum Trading With Discipline.)

Trading DivergenceAs we mentioned earlier, trading divergence is a classic way in which the MACD histogram is used. One of the most common setups is to find chart points at which price makes a new swing high or a new swing low, but the MACD histogram does not, indicating a divergence between price and momentum. Figure 2 illustrates a typical divergence trade.

Figure 2: A typical (negative) divergence trade using a MACD histogram. At the right-hand circle on the price chart, the price movements make a new swing high, but at the corresponding circled point on the MACD histogram, the MACD histogram is unable to exceed its previous high of 0.3307. (The histogram reached this high at the point indicated by the lower left-hand circle.) The divergence is a signal that the price is about to reverse at the new high, and as such, it is a signal for the trader to enter into a short position.
Source: Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
Unfortunately, the divergence trade is not very accurate, as it fails more times than it succeeds. Prices frequently have several final bursts up or down that trigger stops and force traders out of position just before the move actually makes a sustained turn and the trade becomes profitable. Figure 3 demonstrates a typical divergence fakeout, which has frustrated scores of traders over the years. (To learn more, see Using Double Tops And Double Bottoms In Currency Trading.)

Figure 3: A typical divergence fakeout. Strong divergence is illustrated by the right circle (at the bottom of the chart) by the vertical line, but traders who set their stops at swing highs would have been taken out of the trade before it turned in their direction.
Source: Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
One of the reasons that traders often lose with this set up is they enter a trade on a signal from the MACD indicator but exit it based on the move in price. Since the MACD histogram is a derivative of price and is not price itself, this approach is, in effect, the trading version of mixing apples and oranges.

Using the MACD Histogram for Both Entry and Exit

To resolve the inconsistency between entry and exit, a trader can use the MACD histogram for both trade entry and trade exit signals. To do so, the trader trading the negativedivergence takes a partial short position at the initial point of divergence, but instead of setting the stop at the nearest swing high based on price, he or she instead stops out the trade only if the high of the MACD histogram exceeds its previous swing high, indicating that momentum is actually accelerating and the trader is truly wrong on the trade. If, on the other hand, the MACD histogram does not generate a new swing high, the trader then adds to his or her initial position, continually achieving a higher average price for the short.

Currency traders are uniquely positioned to take advantage of this strategy because with this strategy, the larger the position, the larger the potential gains once the price reverses - and in Forex (FX), you can implement this strategy with any size of position and not have to worry about influencing price. (Traders can execute transactions as large as 100,000 units or as little as 1,000 units for the same typical spread of three to five points in the major pairs.)

In effect, this strategy requires the trader to average up as prices temporarily move against him or her. This, however, is typically not considered a good strategy. Many trading books have derisively dubbed such a technique as "adding to your losers." However, in this case the trader has a logical reason for doing so - the MACD histogram has shown divergence, which indicates that momentum is waning and price may soon turn. In effect, the trader is trying to call the bluff between the seeming strength of immediate price action and the MACD readings that hint at weakness ahead. Still, a well-prepared trader using the advantages of fixed costs in FX, by properly averaging up the trade, can withstand the temporary drawdowns until price turns in his or her favor. Figure 4 illustrates this strategy in action.

Figure 4: The chart indicates where price makes successive highs but the MACD histogram does not - foreshadowing the decline that eventually comes. By averaging up his or her short, the trader eventually earns a handsome profit as we see the price making a sustained reversal after the final point of divergence.
Source: Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
The Bottom LineLike life, trading is rarely black and white. Some rules that traders agree on blindly, such as never adding to a loser, can be successfully broken to achieve extraordinary profits. However, a logical, methodical approach for violating these important money management rules needs to be established before attempting to capture gains. In the case of the MACD histogram, trading the indicator instead of the price offers a new way to trade an old idea - divergence. Applying this method to the FX market, which allows effortless scaling up of positions, makes this idea even more intriguing to day traders and position traders alike.

Ads

Trading The MACD Divergence

The concept behind the MACD is fairly straightforward. Essentially, it calculates the difference between an instrument's 26-day and 12-day exponential moving averages (EMA). Of the two moving averages that make up the MACD, the 12-day EMA is obviously the faster one, while the 26-day is slower. In the calculation of their values, both moving averages use the closing prices of whatever period is measured. On the MACD chart, a nine-day EMA of the MACD itself is plotted as well, and it acts as a trigger for buy and sell decisions. The MACD generates a bullish signal when it moves above its own nine-day EMA, and it sends a sell sign when it moves below its nine-day EMA.

The MACD histogram is an elegant visual representation of the difference between the MACD and its nine-day EMA. The histogram is positive when the MACD is above its nine-day EMA and negative when the MACD is below its nine-day EMA. If prices are rising, the histogram grows larger as the speed of the price movement accelerates, and contracts as price movement decelerates. The same principle works in reverse as prices are falling. See Figure 1 for a good example of a MACD histogram in action.

Figure 1: MACD histogram. As price action (top part of the screen) accelerates to the downside, the MACD histogram (in the lower part of the screen) makes new lows
Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
The MACD histogram is the main reason why so many traders rely on this indicator to measure momentum, because it responds to the speed of price movement. Indeed, most traders use the MACD indicator more frequently to gauge the strength of the price move than to determine the direction of a trend. (To learn more, see Momentum Trading With Discipline.)

Trading DivergenceAs we mentioned earlier, trading divergence is a classic way in which the MACD histogram is used. One of the most common setups is to find chart points at which price makes a new swing high or a new swing low, but the MACD histogram does not, indicating a divergence between price and momentum. Figure 2 illustrates a typical divergence trade.

Figure 2: A typical (negative) divergence trade using a MACD histogram. At the right-hand circle on the price chart, the price movements make a new swing high, but at the corresponding circled point on the MACD histogram, the MACD histogram is unable to exceed its previous high of 0.3307. (The histogram reached this high at the point indicated by the lower left-hand circle.) The divergence is a signal that the price is about to reverse at the new high, and as such, it is a signal for the trader to enter into a short position.
Source: Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
Unfortunately, the divergence trade is not very accurate, as it fails more times than it succeeds. Prices frequently have several final bursts up or down that trigger stops and force traders out of position just before the move actually makes a sustained turn and the trade becomes profitable. Figure 3 demonstrates a typical divergence fakeout, which has frustrated scores of traders over the years. (To learn more, see Using Double Tops And Double Bottoms In Currency Trading.)

Figure 3: A typical divergence fakeout. Strong divergence is illustrated by the right circle (at the bottom of the chart) by the vertical line, but traders who set their stops at swing highs would have been taken out of the trade before it turned in their direction.
Source: Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
One of the reasons that traders often lose with this set up is they enter a trade on a signal from the MACD indicator but exit it based on the move in price. Since the MACD histogram is a derivative of price and is not price itself, this approach is, in effect, the trading version of mixing apples and oranges.

Using the MACD Histogram for Both Entry and Exit

To resolve the inconsistency between entry and exit, a trader can use the MACD histogram for both trade entry and trade exit signals. To do so, the trader trading the negativedivergence takes a partial short position at the initial point of divergence, but instead of setting the stop at the nearest swing high based on price, he or she instead stops out the trade only if the high of the MACD histogram exceeds its previous swing high, indicating that momentum is actually accelerating and the trader is truly wrong on the trade. If, on the other hand, the MACD histogram does not generate a new swing high, the trader then adds to his or her initial position, continually achieving a higher average price for the short.

Currency traders are uniquely positioned to take advantage of this strategy because with this strategy, the larger the position, the larger the potential gains once the price reverses - and in Forex (FX), you can implement this strategy with any size of position and not have to worry about influencing price. (Traders can execute transactions as large as 100,000 units or as little as 1,000 units for the same typical spread of three to five points in the major pairs.)

In effect, this strategy requires the trader to average up as prices temporarily move against him or her. This, however, is typically not considered a good strategy. Many trading books have derisively dubbed such a technique as "adding to your losers." However, in this case the trader has a logical reason for doing so - the MACD histogram has shown divergence, which indicates that momentum is waning and price may soon turn. In effect, the trader is trying to call the bluff between the seeming strength of immediate price action and the MACD readings that hint at weakness ahead. Still, a well-prepared trader using the advantages of fixed costs in FX, by properly averaging up the trade, can withstand the temporary drawdowns until price turns in his or her favor. Figure 4 illustrates this strategy in action.

Figure 4: The chart indicates where price makes successive highs but the MACD histogram does not - foreshadowing the decline that eventually comes. By averaging up his or her short, the trader eventually earns a handsome profit as we see the price making a sustained reversal after the final point of divergence.
Source: Source: FXTrek Intellicharts
The Bottom LineLike life, trading is rarely black and white. Some rules that traders agree on blindly, such as never adding to a loser, can be successfully broken to achieve extraordinary profits. However, a logical, methodical approach for violating these important money management rules needs to be established before attempting to capture gains. In the case of the MACD histogram, trading the indicator instead of the price offers a new way to trade an old idea - divergence. Applying this method to the FX market, which allows effortless scaling up of positions, makes this idea even more intriguing to day traders and position traders alike.

Ads

Seven Emerging Currencies Challenging The Forex Hierarchy

n the turbulent world of foreign exchange, the seven most heavily traded currencies occupy a fairly rigid hierarchical order. But though some position shuffling does take place in the top ranks, those moves pale in comparison to the action on the next rung of the forex ladder. In recent years, a number of second-tier currencies have seen a huge increase in their share of global forex turnover, posing a challenge to the established hierarchy. While some of these seven currencies may be obvious, others are less so. Before we delve into learning more about these emerging currencies, let’s take a quick look at the colossal global forex market and the currencies that presently dominate trading in it.

Global Forex Turnover is Soaring

The Bank for International Settlements’ (BIS) triennial survey of forex turnover (or trading volume) is perhaps the most authoritative source of global forex trading data. According to the BIS survey conducted in April 2013, global forex market activity was a staggering $5.3 trillion per day in that month, an increase of 33% from daily turnover of $4 trillion in 2010. Forex turnover has more than quadrupled since 2001, when it was just over $1.2 trillion.
source;http://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/061314/seven-emerging-currencies-challenging-forex-hierarchy.asp